Bajwa J, Munir U, Nori A, Williams B. Synthetic intelligence in healthcare: reworking the follow of medication. Future Healthc J. 2021;8:e188–94.
Venishetty N, Alkassis M, Raheem O. The position of synthetic intelligence in male infertility: analysis and therapy: a story assessment. Uro. 2024;4:23–35.
Mouhawasse E, Haff CW, Kumar P, Lack B, Chu Ok, Bansal U, et al. Can AI chatbots precisely reply affected person questions concerning vasectomies? Int J Impot Res. 2024;1–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-024-00970-y.
Razdan S, Siegal AR, Brewer Y, Sljivich M, Valenzuela RJ. Assessing chatGPT’s potential to reply questions pertaining to erectile dysfunction: can our sufferers belief it? Int J Impot Res. 2024;36:734–40.
Sarker IH. Machine studying: algorithms, real-world purposes and analysis instructions. Sn Comput Sci. 2021;2:160.
Agarwal A, Henkel R, Huang CC, Lee MS. Automation of human semen evaluation utilizing a novel synthetic intelligence optical microscopic expertise. Andrologia. 2019;51:e13440.
Shah M, Naik N, Somani BK, Hameed BZ. Synthetic intelligence (AI) in urology-current use and future instructions: an iTRUE research. Turk J Urol. 2020;46:S27–39.
Hanassab S, Nelson SM, Akbarov A, Yeung AC, Hramyka A, Alhamwi T, et al. Explainable synthetic intelligence to establish follicles that optimize medical outcomes throughout assisted conception. Nat Commun. 2025;16:296.
Mora-Sánchez A, Aguilar-Salvador DI, Nowak I. In direction of a gamete matching platform: utilizing immunogenetics and synthetic intelligence to foretell recurrent miscarriage. Npj Digit Med. 2019;2:1–6.
Tsai VF, Zhuang B, Pong YH, Hsieh JT, Chang HC. Internet- and synthetic intelligence–primarily based picture recognition for sperm motility evaluation: verification research. JMIR Med Inform. 2020;8:e20031.
Chung PH, Han TM, Rudnik B, Das AK. Peyronie’s illness: what do we all know and the way can we deal with it? Can J Urol. 2020;27:11–9.
Muneer A. Hypogonadism: an underdiagnosed situation. Tendencies Urol Gynaecol Intercourse Well being. 2010;15:14–7.
Baldwin Ok, Ginsberg P, Harkaway RC. Underneath-reporting of erectile dysfunction amongst males with unrelated urologic situations. Int J Impot Res. 2003;15:87–9.
Liang Y, Huang J, Zhao Q, Mo H, Su Z, Feng S, et al. International, regional, and nationwide prevalence and traits of infertility amongst people of reproductive age (15–49 years) from 1990–2021, with projections to 2040. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2025;40:529–44.
Leung AK, Henry MA, Mehta A. Gaps in male infertility well being providers analysis. Transl Androl Urol. 2018;7:S303–9.
Eisenberg ML, Esteves SC, Lamb DJ, Hotaling JM, Giwercman A, Hwang Ok, et al. Male infertility. Nat Rev Dis Primer. 2023;9:49.
Olisa NP, Campo-Engelstein L, Martins Da Silva S. Male infertility: what on earth is happening? Pilot worldwide questionnaire research concerning medical analysis and fertility therapy for males. Reprod Fertil. 2022;3:207–15.
Carlsen E, Giwercman A, Keiding N, Skakkebaek NE. Proof for lowering high quality of semen throughout previous 50 years. BMJ. 1992;305:609–13.
Levine H, Jørgensen N, Martino-Andrade A, Mendiola J, Weksler-Derri D, Jolles M, et al. Temporal traits in sperm depend: a scientific assessment and meta-regression evaluation of samples collected globally within the twentieth and twenty first centuries. Hum Reprod Replace. 2023;29:157–76.
Sengupta P, Dutta S, Krajewska-Kulak E. The disappearing sperms: evaluation of experiences printed between 1980 and 2015. Am J Mens Well being. 2017;11:1279–304.
CDC. Nationwide ART abstract. 2024 [cited 2024 Dec 17]. Obtainable from: https://www.cdc.gov/artwork/experiences/2021/abstract.html.
Gatimel N, Moreau J, Parinaud J, Léandri RD. Sperm morphology: evaluation, pathophysiology, medical relevance, and state-of-the-art in 2017. Andrology. 2017;5:845–62.
Bijar A, Benavent AP, Mikaeili M, Khayati R. Absolutely automated identification and discrimination of sperm’s components in microscopic photographs of stained human semen smear. J Biomed Sci Eng. 2012;05:384–95.
Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Kogosowski A, Menezo Y, Barak Y. Actual‐time high-quality morphology of motile human sperm cells is related to IVF‐ICSI end result. J Androl. 2002;23:1–8.
Björndahl L, Kirkman Brown J. The sixth version of the WHO laboratory guide for the examination and processing of human semen: making certain high quality and standardization in fundamental examination of human ejaculates. Fertil Steril. 2022;117:246–51.
Czubaszek M, Andraszek Ok, Banaszewska D, Walczak-Jędrzejowska R. The impact of the staining approach on morphological and morphometric parameters of boar sperm. PLOS ONE. 2019;14:e0214243.
Butola A, Popova D, Prasad DK, Ahmad A, Habib A, Tinguely JC, et al. Excessive spatially delicate quantitative section imaging assisted with deep neural community for classification of human spermatozoa beneath burdened situation. Sci Rep. 2020;10:13118.
Sahoo AJ, Kumar Y. Seminal high quality prediction utilizing information mining strategies. Technol Well being Care. 2014;22:531–45.
Ilhan HO, Serbes G, Aydin N. Automated sperm morphology evaluation method utilizing a directional masking approach. Comput Biol Med. 2020;122:103845.
Finelli R, Leisegang Ok, Tumallapalli S, Henkel R, Agarwal A. The validity and reliability of computer-aided semen analyzers in performing semen evaluation: a scientific assessment. Transl Androl Urol. 2021;10:3069–79.
Yibre AM, Koçer B. Semen high quality predictive mannequin utilizing feed forwarded neural community educated by learning-based synthetic algae algorithm. Eng Sci Technol Int J. 2021;24:310–8.
Parrella A, Rubio Riquelme N, Van Os Galdos LA, Vilella Amorós I, Jiménez Gadea M, Aizpurua J. P-110 a novel synthetic intelligence microscopy: mojo AISA, the brand new strategy to carry out semen evaluation. Hum Reprod. 2022;37:deac107.106.
Salih M, Austin C, Warty RR, Tiktin C, Rolnik DL, Momeni M, et al. Embryo choice by way of synthetic intelligence versus embryologists: a scientific assessment. Hum Reprod Open. 2023;2023:hoad031.
Berntsen J, Rimestad J, Lassen JT, Tran D, Kragh MF. Sturdy and generalizable embryo choice primarily based on synthetic intelligence and time-lapse picture sequences. PloS ONE. 2022;17:e0262661.
Borna MR, Sepehri MM, Maleki B. A synthetic intelligence algorithm to pick out most viable embryos contemplating present course of in IVF labs. Entrance Artif Intell. 2024;7:1375474.
GhoshRoy D, Alvi PA, Santosh KC. Explainable AI to foretell male fertility utilizing excessive gradient boosting algorithm with SMOTE. Electronics. 2023;12:15.
Javadi S, Mirroshandel SA. A novel deep studying technique for automated evaluation of human sperm photographs. Comput Biol Med. 2019;109:182–94.
Yüzkat M, Ilhan HO, Aydin N. Multi-model CNN fusion for sperm morphology evaluation. Comput Biol Med. 2021;137:104790.
Agarwal A, Baskaran S, Parekh N, Cho CL, Henkel R, Vij S, et al. Male infertility. Lancet Lond Engl. 2021;397:319–33.
AlZoubi O, Abu Awad M, Abdalla AM, Samrraie L. Varicocele detection in ultrasound photographs utilizing deep studying. Multimed Instruments Appl. 2024;83:63617–34.
Kayra MV, Şahin A, Toksöz S, Serindere M, Altıntaş E, Özer H, et al. Machine learning-based classification of varicocoele grading: a promising method for prognosis and therapy optimization. Andrology. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13776.
Ory J, Tradewell MB, Blankstein U, Lima TF, Nackeeran S, Gonzalez DC, et al. Synthetic intelligence primarily based machine studying fashions predict sperm parameter upgrading after varicocele restore: a multi-institutional evaluation. World J Mens Well being. 2022;40:618–26.
Crafa A, Russo M, Cannarella R, Gül M, Compagnone M, Mongioì LM, et al. Predictability of varicocele restore success: preliminary outcomes of a machine learning-based method. Asian J Androl. 2024;27:52–8.
Pellegrino F, Sjoberg DD, Tin AL, Benfante NE, Briganti A, Montorsi F, et al. Relationship between age, comorbidity, and the prevalence of erectile dysfunction. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;9:162.
Lin H, Zhao L, Wu H, Cao M, Jiang H. Sexual life and medicine taking behaviours in younger males: an internet survey of 92 620 respondents in China. Int J Clin Pract. 2020;74:e13417.
Şahin MF, Ateş H, Keleş A, Özcan R, Doğan Ç, Akgül M, et al. Responses of 5 totally different synthetic intelligence chatbots to the highest searched queries about erectile dysfunction: a comparative evaluation. J Med Syst. 2024;48:38.
Baturu M, Solakhan M, Kazaz TG, Bayrak O. Incessantly requested questions on erectile dysfunction: evaluating synthetic intelligence solutions with knowledgeable mentorship. Int J Impot Res. 2025;37:310–4.
Chen XY, Lu WT, Zhang D, Tan MY, Qin X. Growth and validation of a prediction mannequin for ED utilizing machine studying: in response to NHANES 2001–2004. Sci Rep. 2024;14:27279.
Glavaš S, Valenčić L, Trbojević N, Tomašić AM, Turčić N, Tibauth S, et al. Erectile perform in cardiovascular sufferers: its significance and a fast evaluation utilizing a visual-scale questionnaire. Acta Cardiol. 2015;70:712–9.
Chen YF, Lin CS, Hong CF, Lee DJ, Solar C, Lin HH. Design of a medical resolution help system for predicting erectile dysfunction in males utilizing NHIRD dataset. IEEE J Biomed Well being Inform. 2019;23:2127–37.
Oh JH, Kerns S, Ostrer H, Powell SN, Rosenstein B, Deasy JO. Computational strategies utilizing genome-wide affiliation research to foretell radiotherapy issues and to establish correlative molecular processes. Sci Rep. 2017;7:43381.
Hasannejadasl H, Roumen C, Poel van der H, Vanneste B, Roermund van J, Aben Ok, et al. Growth and exterior validation of multivariate prediction fashions for erectile dysfunction in males with localized prostate most cancers. PLOS ONE. 2023;18:e0276815.
Agochukwu-Mmonu N, Murali A, Wittmann D, Denton B, Dunn RL, Montie J, et al. Growth and validation of dynamic multivariate prediction fashions of sexual perform restoration in sufferers with prostate most cancers present process radical prostatectomy: outcomes from the MUSIC statewide collaborative. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022;40:1.
Saikali S, Reddy S, Gokaraju M, Goldsztein N, Dyer A, Gamal A, et al. Growth and evaluation of an AI-based machine studying mannequin for predicting urinary continence and erectile perform restoration after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: insights from a prostate most cancers referral heart. Comput Strategies Applications Biomed. 2025;259:108522.
Rew KT, Heidelbaugh JJ. Erectile dysfunction. Am Fam Doctor. 2016;94:820–7.
Gorek M, Stief CG, Hartung C, Jonas U. Laptop-assisted interpretation of electromyograms of corpora cavernosa utilizing fuzzy logic. World J Urol. 1997;15:65–70.
Kellner B, Stief CG, Hinrichs H, Hartung C. Computerized classification of corpus cavernosum electromyogram indicators by way of discriminant evaluation and synthetic neural networks to help prognosis of erectile dysfunction. Urol Res. 2000;28:6–13.
Kim YH. Synthetic intelligence in medical ultrasonography: driving on an unpaved street. Ultrasonography. 2021;40:313.
Li L, Fan W, Li J, Li Q, Wang J, Fan Y, et al. Irregular mind construction as a possible biomarker for venous erectile dysfunction: proof from multimodal MRI and machine studying. Eur Radiol. 2018;28:3789–800.
Smerina DR, Pearlman AM. The intersection of synthetic intelligence, wearable gadgets, and sexual medication. Curr Urol Rep. 2024;26:14.
Ogrinc FG, Linet OI. Analysis of real-time RigiScan monitoring in pharmacological erection. J Urol. 1995;154:1356–9.
Heo Y, Kim J, Cha C, Shin Ok, Roh J, Jo J. Wearable E-textile and CNT sensor wi-fi measurement system for real-time penile erection monitoring. Sensors. 2021;22:231.
Konstantinidis DRCV, Alexandrou S, Alexandrou M, Raheem AA. Adam sensor: a novel nocturnal penile tumescence wearable system – expertise overview & purposes. J Intercourse Med. 2022;19:S133–4.
Sng CMN, Wee LMC, Tang KC, Lee KCJ, Wu QH, Yeo JC, et al. Wearable gentle microtube sensors for quantitative home-based erectile dysfunction monitoring. Sensors. 2022;22:9344.
Saffati G, Orozco Rendon D, Day by day R, Khera M, Justin E. (039) Erection length and firmness: a descriptive evaluation from a population-based research. J Intercourse Med. 2024;21:qdae161.032.
Lange M, Charles D, Kazeem A, Jones M, Solar F, Ghosal S, et al. Is low-intensity shockwave remedy for erectile dysfunction a sturdy therapy possibility?-long-term outcomes of a randomized sham-controlled trial. Transl Androl Urol. 2024;13:2194–200.
Lee M, Sharifi R. Non-invasive administration choices for erectile dysfunction when a phosphodiesterase kind 5 inhibitor fails. Medicine Getting older. 2018;35:175–87.
Jang I, Lee JU, Lee JM, Kim BH, Moon B, Hong J, et al. LC–MS/MS software program for screening unknown erectile dysfunction medication and analogues: synthetic neural community classification, peak-count scoring, easy similarity search, and hybrid similarity search algorithms. Anal Chem. 2019;91:9119–28.
Yang R, Liu C, Li Q, Wang W, Wu B, Chen A, et al. Synthetic intelligence primarily based identification of the purposeful position of hirudin in diabetic erectile dysfunction therapy. Pharmacol Res. 2021;163:105244.
Furtado TP, Osadchiy V, Eleswarapu SV. The promise of synthetic intelligence in Peyronie’s illness. Curr Urol Rep. 2025;26:3.
Al-Thakafi S, Al-Hathal N. Peyronie’s illness: a literature assessment on epidemiology, genetics, pathophysiology, prognosis and work-up. Transl Androl Urol. 2016;5:280–9.
Levine LA. Developments and challenges in Peyronie’s illness: a private journey and present views. Int J Impot Res. 2024;36:105–6.
Baray SB, Abdelmoniem M, Mahmud S, Kabir S, Faisal MAA, Chowdhury MEH, et al. Automated measurement of penile curvature utilizing deep learning-based novel quantification technique. Entrance Pediatr. 2023;11:1149318.
Abbas TO, AbdelMoniem M, Chowdhury MEH. Automated quantification of penile curvature utilizing synthetic intelligence. Entrance Artif Intell. 2022;5:954497.
Walker DT, Jiang T, Santamaria A, Osadchiy V, Daniels D, Sturm RM, et al. 3D-printed phantoms to quantify accuracy and variability of goniometric and volumetric evaluation of Peyronie’s illness deformities. Int J Impot Res. 2022;34:786–9.
Siapno AED, Yi BC, Daniels D, Bolagani A, Kwan L, Walker D, et al. Measurement accuracy of 3-Dimensional mapping applied sciences versus commonplace goniometry for angle evaluation. J Pediatr Urol. 2020;16:547–54.
Tostain JL, Blanc F. Testosterone deficiency: a typical, unrecognized syndrome. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2008;5:388–96.
David J, Charles A. Limitations to prognosis and accessing efficient therapy and help for testosterone deficiency. J Mens Well being. 2024;20:62–71.
Hartman-Kenzler J, Torres J, Alami-Harandi A, Miller C, Park J, Berg W. MP47-13 CHATGPT explains testosterone remedy: correct solutions with questionable references. J Urol. 2024;211:e768.
Pabla H, Lange A, Nadiminty N, Sindhwani P. Responses of synthetic intelligence chatbots to testosterone alternative remedy: sufferers beware! Société Int D’Urologie J. 2025;6:13.
Kim JW, Moon DG. Optimizing getting old male symptom questionnaire by way of genetic algorithms primarily based machine studying strategies. World J Mens Well being. 2020;39:139.
American Urological Affiliation. Testosterone deficiency guideline. 2024 [cited 2025 Jan 21]. Obtainable from: https://www.auanet.org/guidelines-and-quality/pointers/testosterone-deficiency-guideline.
Lu T, Hu YH, Tsai CF, Liu SP, Chen PL. Making use of machine studying strategies to the identification of late-onset hypogonadism in aged males. SpringerPlus. 2016;5:729.
Novaes MT, Ferreira de Carvalho OL, Guimarães Ferreira PH, Nunes Tiraboschi TL, Silva CS, Zambrano JC, et al. Prediction of secondary testosterone deficiency utilizing machine studying: a comparative evaluation of ensemble and base classifiers, chance calibration, and sampling methods in a barely imbalanced dataset. Inform Med Unlocked. 2021;23:100538.
Şahin MF, Keleş A, Özcan R, Doğan Ç, Topkaç EC, Akgül M, et al. Analysis of data accuracy and readability: chatGPT responses to probably the most regularly requested questions on untimely ejaculation. Intercourse Med. 2024;12:qfae036.
Athanasiadis L. Untimely ejaculation: is it a biogenic or a psychogenic dysfunction? J Intercourse Marital Ther. 1998;13:241–55.
Anıl H, Kayra MV. The digital dialogue on untimely ejaculation: evaluating the efficacy of synthetic intelligence-driven responses. Int Urol Nephrol. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-025-04461-x.
Carlson JA, Cheng RZ, Lange A, Nagalakshmi N, Rabets J, Shah T, et al. Accuracy and readability of synthetic intelligence chatbot responses to vasectomy-related questions: public beware. Cureus. 2024;16:e67996.
Chung D, Sidhom Ok, Dhillon H, Bal DS, Fidel MG, Jawanda G, et al. Actual-world utility of chatGPT in pre-vasectomy counselling, a protected and environment friendly follow: a potential single-centre medical research. World J Urol. 2024;43:32.
Esmaeilzadeh P. Challenges and methods for wide-scale synthetic intelligence (AI) deployment in healthcare practices: a perspective for healthcare organizations. Artif Intell Med. 2024;151:102861.
Alowais SA, Alghamdi SS, Alsuhebany N, Alqahtani T, Alshaya AI, Almohareb SN, et al. Revolutionizing healthcare: the position of synthetic intelligence in medical follow. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23:689.
Maleki Varnosfaderani S, Forouzanfar M. The position of AI in hospitals and clinics: reworking healthcare within the twenty first century. Bioengineering. 2024;11:337.
American Urological Affiliation. Pointers & high quality. 2025 [cited 2025 Jan 4]. Obtainable from: https://www.auanet.org/guidelines-and-quality.
Rodler S. Synthetic intelligence significance of pointers to make sure transparency and reproducibility of synthetic intelligence interventions – American urological affiliation. 2024 [cited 2024 Nov 18]. Obtainable from: https://auanews.internet/points/articles/2024/february-extra-2024/artificial-intelligence-importance-of-guidelines-to-ensure-transparency-and-reproducibility-of-artificial-intelligence-interventions.
American Medical Affiliation. AMA: physicians enthusiastic however cautious about well being care AI. 2023 [cited 2024 Nov 3]. Obtainable from: https://www.ama-assn.org/press-center/press-releases/ama-physicians-enthusiastic-cautious-about-health-care-ai.
Laitinen A, Sahlgren O. AI techniques and respect for human autonomy. Entrance Artif Intell. 2021;4:705164.
Murdoch B. Privateness and synthetic intelligence: challenges for safeguarding well being data in a brand new period. BMC Med Ethics. 2021;22:122.
Mittermaier M, Raza MM, Kvedar JC. Bias in AI-based fashions for medical purposes: challenges and mitigation methods. Npj Digit Med. 2023;6:1–3.
Dankwa-Mullan I. Well being fairness and moral concerns in utilizing synthetic intelligence in public well being and medication. Prev Persistent Dis. 2024;21:E64.
Ali S, Abuhmed T, El-Sappagh S, Muhammad Ok, Alonso-Ethical JM, Confalonieri R, et al. Explainable synthetic intelligence (XAI): what we all know and what’s left to realize reliable synthetic intelligence. Inf Fusion. 2023;99:101805.
