
Just a few years in the past we wrote about Veebot after we collected probably the most thrilling duties robots might do in hospitals. Veebot created a robotic that would draw blood – in troublesome instances quicker and much more successfully than a human. Checks confirmed that it could possibly accurately determine probably the most accessible vein with an 83% accuracy. That is about pretty much as good as an skilled human phlebotomist. Furthermore, with this know-how, the blood-drawing course of takes solely a couple of minute.
Veebot’s video was vastly fashionable as a result of they needed to robotise a course of recognized to and disliked by everybody. It turned out that everybody needed the outcome this robotic might obtain – however with out the robotic itself.
Some years glided by and the idea become actuality. Vitestro introduced in 2022 that their blood-drawing robotic, formally known as an ‘Autonomous blood drawing gadget, combining synthetic intelligence, ultrasound imaging, and robotics’, has carried out 1500 blood attracts on 1000+ sufferers.
The corporate now began a large-scale scientific trial, with enrollment of the primary 350 sufferers. This trial will contain a complete of 10,000 sufferers and is predicted to final for 2 years. Vitestro obtained CE marking in 2024, after which the know-how is predicted to be prepared to be used for affected person care in hospitals and laboratories.
Are you afraid of a blood draw?
Blood attracts are some of the widespread scientific procedures, and, as we wrote earlier, it’s unlikely to vary anytime quickly. (Keep in mind Theranos?) There’s merely no different means to attract a enough quantity of blood from the sufferers in any other case. And even supposing it’s a typical process, it’s pretty troublesome for nurses and medical professionals to get sufficient routine. I clearly bear in mind once I first needed to take blood as a health care provider: the affected person, a sort, outdated woman was as scared as I used to be; I used to be attempting to consolation her as a lot as myself. It might be good to spare such an expertise for medics and sufferers alike.
However it will come as no shock: folks don’t like needles or giving blood. Many individuals have simple fears associated to those. A lot in order that we’ve got a number of names for these fears like haemophobia, trypanophobia, BII and so forth. Healthcare professionals themselves typically battle with the process, discovering the veins in sufferers will be notably troublesome; for instance when the affected person is overweight, dehydrated, has sure extreme persistent situations – or just has small or inelastic veins. In these difficult instances, healthcare professionals solely have a median success price of 73% to find the veins with the needle.
Though there are gadgets to help blood attracts (like vein scanners that may assist detect veins), these are costly and may’t assist in each case. However robots can.
Why is it irritating if robots are touching us?
As a result of there’s this subject with robots. We people appear to be type of afraid of them. The extra human-like they turn out to be, the extra we are likely to resent them. And that is even the case if they will do a greater job than people – we don’t need them to take action. This can be a burden we should overcome as one other cultural shift on our route towards digital healthcare.
Just a few years in the past information got here out of a robotic blood draw resolution with hanging examples of their scientific trial about their success price. The automated blood-drawing robotic of Rutgers College’s analysis staff might in some instances outperform human professionals doing the identical activity. Their analysis confirmed that the robotic (that additionally features a blood analyser) might liberate time for nurses and medical doctors to spend extra time treating sufferers as a substitute of jabbing them with needles.
Automatisation as the final word resolution
The robotic gained’t simply assume they know the place the vein runs – it truly sees it. Its arms by no means shake, it’s by no means overworked, it gained’t get drained – and it frees up beneficial nurse time.
Nurses would nonetheless have to be current to supply empathy and help to the affected person. However the burden of the compulsory ‘doing effectively’ shouldn’t be on their shoulders. Course of automation would additionally present a stage of security for the affected person.

Robots in hospitals
The pandemic had been good for robots. They had been deployed in lots of fields. Over the previous years, we might hear about disinfectant robots, surgical robots, robots supporting telehealth, and so forth. The listing is limitless. From humanoids to ‘tablet-on-a-stick’-kind of gadgets, the goal is to help people by taking the load off of their shoulders.

The truth that they may participate in stopping the unfold of COVID-19 in hospitals and assist forestall hospital-acquired infections gave these gadgets a much-needed additional enhance. They thereby might lastly transfer out of the “generally cute however typically ineffective”-category and located an appropriate subject the place they will actually be useful for the folks truly working in hospitals. Like within the case of blood samples taken by robots.
It’s under no circumstances a far-fetched concept, though we actually assume this idea continues to be in its infancy (learn right here why we expect this fashion, replace on the tech right here). Nonetheless, such sci-fiesque applied sciences current a fertile floor for a forward-looking dialogue that’ll assist to grasp the duty of applied sciences that appear unusual at first sight.
We belief MRI scans. Why don’t we belief robots?
As sufferers, we work together with superior medical applied sciences and not using a second thought. We lie nonetheless for MRI scans, endure CT assessments, and topic ourselves to X-rays. We readily belief these machines, regardless of not at all times understanding the main points of how they work.
At The Medical Futurist, our objective is to help healthcare organisations, governments and medical professionals in adopting digital well being applied sciences. We try to construct a group that may drive healthcare innovation worldwide and facilitate the pragmatic and cultural modifications which can be wanted.
In our imaginative and prescient, all of us (medical professionals, sufferers, establishments, and policymakers) make use of the cutting-edge applied sciences that encompass us – however on the core of all healthcare interactions are the individuals who look after and pay attention to one another.
The long run is ready. We simply want somebody to implement it.
The submit Would You Let A Robotic Take Your Blood Pattern? appeared first on The Medical Futurist.